Government takes action by enacting laws that adversely affect someone or the other group in the community, So what is the limit of complaint against such laws. It has to be utterly peaceful through official complaint procedures. That is not what the Court has ruled. One should be allowed to litigate or prosecute an official of the Law Enforcement agency to test the lawfulness of the actions that the Police take towards protestors on the streets against a new law. The Court oversteps its remit as an interference in the democratic process by declaring government laws as being unlawful. Democracy is what it is and government have a job to do to prevent disruption in society caused by protestors on the streets. Under the Parliamentary system of the United Kingdom the ruling party is not obliged to consult widely before enacting a new law. It has a mandate from the electorate through the majority they have in the House of Commons to do what it needs to do to ensure that the bill will pass the vote in the Chambers and get the go-ahead from the House of Lords. That should be sufficient basis for progress.
Shantanu Panigrahi
@ShantanuPanigr8
·
2s
TCLS and so TCLP-UK would qualify by saying that the right to protest peacefully in marches is fundamental to democracy: Home Office protest rules are unlawful, says High Court https://uk.news.yahoo.com/home-office-protest-rules-unlawful-095549418.html?soc_src=social-sh&soc_trk=tw&tsrc=twtr
via
@Yahoo
